|
|
Post by pavaro on Mar 4, 2014 7:53:26 GMT -9
I would like to inform you that I changed the name on PAVARO Studio. Please visit my website www.pavarostudio.pl . I showed there was a new style for my figurines. |
|
|
|
Post by Vermin King on Mar 4, 2014 8:05:07 GMT -9
Looks good. Have you considered doing anything for the Garden of Doom Hoard? I really like your line of trees and the field rows. Maybe something more tropical?
|
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on Mar 4, 2014 10:29:36 GMT -9
Thanks. On this time I have a few projects in the initial phase. If I manage to do something more, I'll add.
|
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on Jun 15, 2014 5:03:41 GMT -9
I would like introduce my new target. I want renew looks my figurines. The changes aim to break with the childlike appearance. They should look lovely but not childish. This is first result my work - link - first post. What you think? I know I will never attain the apogee of its capabilities. Please bear with us. I have plan on renew all my sets. |
|
|
|
Post by dungeonmistress on Jun 15, 2014 6:52:42 GMT -9
Very good, pavaro. The eyes are placed, maybe, a little too high, or else the head is a little flat, but overall, a definite improvement. Well done. |
|
|
|
Post by Vermin King on Jun 15, 2014 16:16:22 GMT -9
 Very handsome |
|
|
|
Post by WackyAnne on Jun 15, 2014 23:03:13 GMT -9
Very good, pavaro. The eyes are placed, maybe, a little too high, or else the head is a little flat, but overall, a definite improvement. Well done. I agree, pavaro, the detail level has increased nicely, and your style is maturing. Overall, your figures are looking great. However, your farmer's lost his forehead  It's funny, the difference between what we see and what we _think_ we see. Because people tend to focus on the facial features, rather than "blank" areas like the forehead, we often get the proportions wrong when we are first drawing them. Actually, the forehead takes up about a third of the height of the face (almost half in babies' faces). You'll see better with an example:  Here you can see that the hair/skull goes up beyond that third taken up by the forehead. You can google "facial proportions" for other images. Now, I'm not an artist (at least not in drawing) by any means, but my art history and design training has helped to see things a bit clearer. I could in no way do as well as you, pavaro, and certainly no better. Keep up the good work, and keep improving! |
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on Jun 16, 2014 12:21:29 GMT -9
Very good, pavaro. The eyes are placed, maybe, a little too high, or else the head is a little flat, but overall, a definite improvement. Well done. Very handsome Very good, pavaro. The eyes are placed, maybe, a little too high, or else the head is a little flat, but overall, a definite improvement. Well done. I agree, pavaro, the detail level has increased nicely, and your style is maturing. Overall, your figures are looking great. However, your farmer's lost his forehead It's funny, the difference between what we see and what we _think_ we see. Because people tend to focus on the facial features, rather than "blank" areas like the forehead, we often get the proportions wrong when we are first drawing them. Actually, the forehead takes up about a third of the height of the face (almost half in babies' faces). You'll see better with an example: Here you can see that the hair/skull goes up beyond that third taken up by the forehead. You can google "facial proportions" for other images. Now, I'm not an artist (at least not in drawing) by any means, but my art history and design training has helped to see things a bit clearer. I could in no way do as well as you, pavaro, and certainly no better. Keep up the good work, and keep improving! Thank you very much for for all sugestions and opinions. WackyAnne and dungeonmistress you have are right. But this exertions ("lost his forehead") was done on purpose. He had be a little funny, a little crass and a bit sweet. This is a little steppingstone from realistic human proportions. I have a lot of books about the human body. Vermin King These are my first models.  I am ashamed to their, becouse they look awfully. This picture shows only differences between my beginning and current status. |
|
|
|
Post by WackyAnne on Jun 16, 2014 18:45:01 GMT -9
I hope I didn't offend you pavaro - I figured I'd include the proportion pics just in case, and more for others reading this in future. I now recall you were looking at a cartoonish-style when you were trying to settle on a personal style going forward. BTW (By the way), I still like the figures that Vermin King posted - they seemed fine to me! But I know that seeing past work can sometimes feel great, and sometimes feel terrible... |
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on Jun 17, 2014 0:29:29 GMT -9
I hope I didn't offend you pavaro - I figured I'd include the proportion pics just in case, and more for others reading this in future. I now recall you were looking at a cartoonish-style when you were trying to settle on a personal style going forward. BTW (By the way), I still like the figures that Vermin King posted - they seemed fine to me! But I know that seeing past work can sometimes feel great, and sometimes feel terrible... No, no, I'm not offended. On the contrary, I am very happy that someone is interested my works (I hope...). Coming soon new sets. The next figures will be more dynamic. |
|
|
|
Post by Parduz on Jun 17, 2014 4:18:53 GMT -9
The onlhy tiny parduzzing i can do (really, i'm splitting hair, now ) is by looking at your rifleman: A trained soldier will lean a bit forward, putting all his weight on his fron leg, to counter-balance the recoil, while your rifleman is on his back leg. (At least, this is what happens today.... i dunno what they were doing 100 years ago but i don't see why it should have been different ) |
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on Jun 17, 2014 12:57:30 GMT -9
The onlhy tiny parduzzing i can do (really, i'm splitting hair, now ) is by looking at your rifleman: A trained soldier will lean a bit forward, putting all his weight on his fron leg, to counter-balance the recoil, while your rifleman is on his back leg. (At least, this is what happens today.... i dunno what they were doing 100 years ago but i don't see why it should have been different ) Dear Members. This photo is outdated. This means that today I design quite different figures. My first models were poorly drawn. I must move old photo to a separate section on my website. I hope that will be such interest in my new projects on this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by Parduz on Jun 17, 2014 14:13:24 GMT -9
Don't worry: i'll parduz you 'til you'll say "enough!"  |
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on May 29, 2015 8:33:10 GMT -9
I wonder if I do not have children's drawing style. Here is some examples. What do you think? Do you think I should draw more mature? |
|
|
|
Post by cowboyleland on May 29, 2015 10:05:15 GMT -9
I think I may have said this before: your style reminds me of Patrick Crusiau. I would think of that as a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by berneart76 on May 29, 2015 10:36:14 GMT -9
pavaro, I actually like your style, they figures get across a good tabletop impression without becoming too complicated and muddying up the appearance, especially when reduced to 20mm or 15mm scales... I don't see them as being childish, I see them as being simple and clear without being simplistic. Hopefully soon my group will actually be able to coordinate to get some actual playing time in, and I plan on using a variety of your figures as the Games master to help with encounters!
|
|
|
|
Post by migibb on May 29, 2015 12:18:12 GMT -9
I am loving the way your style is developing pavaro. And can't wait to see those undead released!! |
|
|
|
Post by pavaro on May 29, 2015 21:58:53 GMT -9
Thanks guys! Thanks to you I know that my work makes sense.
|
|
I am ashamed to their, becouse they look awfully. This picture shows only differences between my beginning and current status.
